On 10/15/07, Matthew Inger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As part of the ant-contrib project, I had written a task which, underneath
> the covers,
> used the ivy library to resolve a jar file, extract it locally in the ivy
> cache, and import an
> ant build script.
>
> <ac:importurl org="org" name="name" rev="latest.release" />
>
> The following actions would be performed:
>    1.  Resolve the requested module using ivy's inline resolution
> capabilities
>    2.  Expand the resolved .jar/.zip file to the ivy cache
>    3.  Import the "build.xml" contained in the jar file (the imported
> filename is
>           overridable via the "resource" attribute on the task).
>
> In theory, it's a wrapper for 3 operations:
>
>    <ivy:resolve />
>    <unjar />
>    <import />
>
> This gave me the capability to build re-usable build components which
> could
> be shared amongst different projects.  The components live in the ivy
> repository.
> As a result, it became very easy for me to have one common set of build
> tasks,
> which could be updated across the board for all projects simply by
> publishing a
> version of the dependency.
>
> I realize that this is typically accomplished using an ant <import>
> task.  However, that
> has several drawback, which i won't go into here, unless someone really
> wants me to.
>
> With the pending release of Ivy 2.0, this task will no longer work without
> code changes
> to account for the changes to the API from 1.4.1 to 2.0.
>
> I'm wondering if this task might be better suited to being owned by the
> Ivy project itself.
> I am more than willing to donate the code to the Ivy project.  As the
> ant-contrib project
> is published under the Apache 2.0 license, i don't see any issues with
> this.
>
> Any thoughts from the dev team?


I like the idea behind this task, and think it could fit in the picture of
Ivy. So I think moving this to the Ivy project can be nice. We have to think
about several things though:
- since you are not a committer on Ivy (yet), you will have to submit
patches if you later want to improve the task. Is this ok for you?
- do you have documentation and unit test for this task? Documentation is
mandatory, and unit test are highly appreciated :-)

Thoughts?

Xavier

----
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Once you start down the dark path, forever will it
> dominate your destiny.  Consume you it will " - Yoda
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Need a vacation? Get great deals
> to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
> http://travel.yahoo.com/
>



-- 
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/

Reply via email to