On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Mitch Gitman <[email protected]> wrote:
> But Archie, can you or anyone else articulate in your own words the rules > of > latest-compatible? The current brief description in the documentation can > be > interpreted to mean anything. I would find it troubling if the maintainers > of an open-source framework are moving to a different default behavior, and > no one can put in plain English what that default behavior does. > I agree with that and would also like to understand the algorithm that latest-compatible uses before we decide to inflict it on everyone. Hopefully someone will explain it to us, otherwise I guess I'll have to do some code diving... :-) -Archie -- Archie L. Cobbs
