I would go for names like ivy-core (or just ivy) and ivy-ant
which is quite self explaining in my opinion. On 7/3/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/3/07, Tjeerd Verhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > the same question arrised to me, as I find the names also no so self > explaining > > > ivy-core-2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating.jar --> The Ivy core system > ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating.jar --> The Ivy core system + The Ant tasks > > So when using in combination with Ant the ivy-2*.jar is enough. Indeed, we plan to review the packaging before 2.0 final. The current packaging is mainly historical, Ivy was previously packaged as only one jar (ivy-[version].jar). Then the need for a jar without the Ant tasks raised for IvyDE, and we created the "core", which isn't really what we call the core in development. In development the core is what can be built without dependencies, and our build script first builds the core, then use the freshly built core to resolve Ivy optional dependencies, and then build the parts of Ivy depending on these optional dependencies. So we may change the artifact names and packaging in coming versions. Xavier On 7/3/07, hezjing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > The apache-ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating-bin.tar.gz contains 2 JARs > > > > 1) ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating.jar > > 2) ivy-core-2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating.jar > > > > > > May I know what is the different between these 2 JARs? > > > > Should I copy both JARs into $ANT_HOME/lib? > > > > > > -- > > > > Hez > > > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant Creator of Ivy, xooki and xoocode.org More about me: http://xhab.blogspot.com/
