One advantage of using BuildList and resolve/publish is that I can insure that the repo is consistent.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Using buildlist to generate a repo > > No change at all! You can use mere file copy if you want. > > Xavier > > On 11/6/07, Jim Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, what changes happen on publish that I have to simulate? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:46 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Using buildlist to generate a repo > > > > > > Yes but it seems that you already put your module files in a semi > > structured > > > way. So with proper settings you should be able to use this a the > > source > > > repository for the install task. Remember, with Ivy, almost anything > > can be > > > used as a repository! > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > On 11/6/07, Jim Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Actually I am trying to create the repo so I am not sure that the > > > > install task does what I want it to do. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:22 PM > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: Using buildlist to generate a repo > > > > > > > > > > On 11/6/07, Jim Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > We have a set of external resources/jars that we need to put > > into a > > > > repo > > > > > > to build our products. This set consists of more than one > > version of > > > > > > some third party jars because some of our products use different > > > > > > versions of these jars. I created ivy.xml files and build..xml > > files > > > > for > > > > > > each of these in a directory structure that would allow me to > > use > > > > > > buildlist to generate an Ant path that would allow me to publish > > > > them in > > > > > > the correct order. Another by product of this is that I will end > > up > > > > with > > > > > > a reproducible process that we can use to add new versions and > > new > > > > jars > > > > > > to the repo. > > > > > > > > > > > > This all seemed pretty straightforward to me so I was surprised > > when > > > > one > > > > > > of the publishes failed because the other jars it depended on > > were > > > > not > > > > > > in the repo. In examining the output I found that I had 2 > > versions > > > > of > > > > > > Hibernate and one version of Hibernate_tools that I needed in > > the > > > > repo. > > > > > > Only the latest version of Hibernate showed up in the repo. > > > > > > Hibernate_tools required the older version and thus failed to > > > > resolve. > > > > > > > > > > > > When I looked that the Buildlist task in ivy 2.0 (fairly current > > was > > > > we > > > > > > are actually using a build from the trunk to try out another bug > > > > fix) I > > > > > > found that Buildlist uses a linkedHashMap where the key is the > > name > > > > of > > > > > > the module. Version is lost. Thus there is no way to do what I > > want > > > > to > > > > > > do. Can you think of another way to do this or do I have to > > re-write > > > > > > buildlist to handle this case? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure to get the full picture of what you want to do but it > > > > sounds > > > > > like what you want to do would be better achieved with the install > > > > task > > > > > rather than the buildlist task. buildlist is meant to order a set > > of > > > > modules > > > > > according to their dependencies, but wasn't meant to deal with > > > > multiple > > > > > versions of the same module, since often ivy files to order (which > > are > > > > > development ivy files) do not have version information (as opposed > > to > > > > > repository ivy files). The install task is meant to install a set > > of > > > > modules > > > > > including (or not) their dependencies, from one repo to another > > one. > > > > This > > > > > sounds much closer to what you want from what I understand. Is > > there a > > > > > limitation of the install task that prevent you from using it in > > your > > > > case? > > > > > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > > > > > Jim Adams > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Principal Systems Developer > > > > > > SAS Institute > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > > > > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > > > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ > > > > > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > > > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > > > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ > > > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > > > > > -- > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ > http://www.xoocode.org/
