Is there a way to say this module doesn't produce any artefacts.. or am I
coming at this all wrong? I've been creating a few ivy configs to describe
some of the 3rd party projects I'm using. Much like the dual resolver
example I've got an jung-2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT.xml file:
<ivy-module version="1.4">
<info module="jung"
status="integration"
revision="2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT"/>
<dependencies>
<dependency name="jung-api" rev="2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT"
changing="true"/>
<dependency name="jung-algorithms" rev="2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT"
changing="true"/>
<dependency name="jung-graph-impl" rev="2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT"
changing="true"/>
<dependency name="jung-io" rev="2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT"
changing="true"/>
<dependency name="jung-visualization" rev="2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT"
changing="true"/>
<dependency name="collections-generic" rev="4.01"/>
<dependency name="colt" rev="1.2.0"/>
<dependency name="concurrent" rev="1.3.4"/>
</dependencies>
</ivy-module>
But when resolve runs it's looking for an implicit
jung-2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT.jar which doesn't exist. Technically this project
doesn't have a single main jar resource. Can I say don't produce any
artefacts (I'm just only describing dependencies here) Or should I just
nominate one of the jars (the api one?) as the product? i.e. rename to
jung-api, jung-api-2.0-alpha3-SNAPSHOT.xml and remove its dependency?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-supress-the-default-published-artefact-tp14804076p14804076.html
Sent from the ivy-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
