Hi Michael,
Thanks for the suggestions.
I'll look at the relevant codebase for schema 1.1 inheritable
attributes implementation, and would make the changes to
implementation as suggested by you and would submit the changes for
review asap.
I might ask questions to seek clarifications if needed.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Michael Glavassevich
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just catching up on recent changes and noticing the additions to the PSVI
> for XML Schema 1.1.
>
> I think we're going to need to revisit how inherited attributes are exposed.
> They're supposed to be a list of attribute information items and that is
> more than just a value and attribute declaration. Perhaps we should be using
> the full AttributePSVI to represent them.
>
> I also believe we should be consistent with the rest of the API which for
> collections returns immutable Lists instead of arrays (that can be corrupted
> by the user).
>
> Also need to be careful about introducing new dependencies into other
> layers. XNI has never had a dependency on the XML Schema API and I don't
> think it should. When we need a new schema specific interface for supporting
> new PSVI properties or a new schema component it really should be added to
> the XML Schema API (org.apache.xerces.xs.*).
>
> Thanks.
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: [email protected]
> E-mail: [email protected]
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
