[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mukul Gandhi updated XERCESJ-1508:
----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 2.12.0

> implementation of XSD 1.1 type tables equivalence, for element declaration 
> consistent constraint
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XERCESJ-1508
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1508
>             Project: Xerces2-J
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: XML Schema 1.1 Structures
>    Affects Versions: 2.11.0
>            Reporter: Mukul Gandhi
>            Assignee: Mukul Gandhi
>             Fix For: 2.12.0
>
>
> I'm creating this JIRA issue for tracking purpose.
> XML Schema 1.1 enhances the constraint, "Schema Component Constraint: Element 
> Declarations Consistent" with following additional clause (the clause 
> numbered 4 below):
> (quoted from the XML Schema 1.1 language specification)
> If the {particles} property contains, either directly, indirectly (that is, 
> within the {particles} property of a contained model group, recursively), or 
> - implicitly- , two or more element declarations with the same expanded name, 
> 1 ...
> 2 ...
> 3 ...
> 4 All their {type table}s are either all - absent-  or else all are present 
> and - equivalent- . 
> The equivalence of type tables is defined as follows:
> [Definition:] A Type Table T1 is equivalent to a Type Table T2 if and only if 
> all of the following are true:
> 1 T1.{alternatives} has the same length as T2.{alternatives} and their 
> corresponding entries are - equivalent- .
> 2 T1.{default type definition} and T2.{default type definition} are - 
> equivalent- .
> We implemented this constraint, post Xerces 2.11.0 release.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to