Thanks. That's pretty much what I was hoping. On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:28 PM Michael Glavassevich <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is correct. It was not implemented. My own concerns about compatibility > aside, we weren't sure Xerces could support XML 1.0 fifth edition while also > being compliant to JAXP. I suppose we could have implemented it as part of a > non-default configuration but who would turn it on? Someone who really wants > this could choose to write an XML 1.1 document instead. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]> > Sent: January 22, 2023 6:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] XML 1.0 Fifth Edition name rules in Xerces > > I wanted to check on the current status of XML 1.0 Fifth edition name rules > in Xerces2 for Java. (The retcon where the W3C imported the XML > 1.1 name rules and declared they had always meant something completely > different than and incompatible with the BNF grammar in the first through > fourth editions.) > > I don't see anything about this in Jira or the release notes, and in my > simple test it looks like these changes are not implemented, at least not in > the DTDConfiguration. Is that correct? > > -- > Elliotte Rusty Harold > [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
-- Elliotte Rusty Harold [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
