Ivan Todoroski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/24/2007 04:19:47 PM: > On 24.01.2007 19:58, Michael Glavassevich wrote: > > There's no "magic" method for getting the particle. A similar question [1] > > was asked a couple months ago. Here's what I said in response then: > > I see. Well, at least you've spared me from digging through the API > in vain, so > thank you, and sorry about the duplicate question, I did search the > lists but I > missed that. > > > "Xerces transforms the content model into a DFA (see [2]) which it uses > > for validation. We don't store the XSParticles in this representation but > > it should give you some idea of the complexity and perhaps a starting > > point." > > > > It's probably worth looking at the content model builder [3] too. > > Thanks for the useful pointers, I'll check them out. In the mean > time, do you by > any chance know if such functionality is planned in the foreseeable > future, or should I not hold my breath?
There are no plans to support this. It probably wasn't considered in the original design because particles aren't exposed in the PSVI and aren't needed by any of Xerces' internals after the content models are constructed. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
