On Jan 26, 2008 5:16 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your first statement is not true, at least for Xerces (see my other > reply in this thread).
Thanks for clarifying this. > Regarding you second statement "But the text content will be null.": > > void characters (char ch[], int start, int length) > > I think it is logical if the 'length' parameter to a character > callback is > 0, 'ch' cannot be null, and if length == 0 then no > character callback should be made, so 'ch' should never be null. > This could also be deducted from the general principle if the > contract doesn't explicitly state null values are permitted - they > are not. I agree to this. Thanks for the clarification. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
