Peter Major <peter.ma...@forgerock.com> wrote on 11/05/2015 02:24:58 AM:

> How about these then?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273638

Xerces doesn't support that property.

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273645

Xerces doesn't have a StAX XML parser.

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273637

The portion of the hashing collision issue that applies to Xerces is fixed 
on the trunk (in other words, after Xerces 2.11.0). See: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1357381.

The rest of the hashing issue is in the Java platform itself. See 
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/180.

> 2015. 11. 04. 16:38 keltezéssel, Michael Glavassevich írta:
> > As they did not disclose any details in these reports, only Oracle 
would
> > know.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Michael Glavassevich
> > XML Technologies and WAS Development
> > IBM Toronto Lab
> > E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
> > E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org
> >
> > Peter Major <peter.ma...@forgerock.com> wrote on 11/04/2015 03:36:26 
AM:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> it appears that Oracle has fixed some XML parsing related security
> >> vulnerabilities:
> >> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-4803
> >> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-4893
> >> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-4911
> >>
> >> Is it possible that these also affect Xerces 2.11.0?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Peter
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org

Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org

Reply via email to