Dnia 2012-12-19, Wed o godzinie 09:45 -0700, Justin T Pryzby pisze: > Can someone tell me if it's appropriate to patch storage_ldapvcard.c > to either: 1) make publishedattr optional; OR, 2) remove publishattr > entirely; OR (probably), 3) allow a custom <query>, as in authreg_ldap > module (but not ldapfull), which overrides both publishedattr and > validattr.
Option 3) seems reasonable. > 2nd question: is it reasonable to patch authreg_ldapfull to accept a > <query> parameter? The current implementation doesn't allow testing > for group membership. I think that's the only reason we can't > currently use ldapfull. It could be the first step for merging both implementations.
