Hi. date/year should be treated as one of those either-or fields, like author/editor for bibtex book entries (but not biblatex; biblatex books always have author(s), no editor(s); differences between bibtex and biblatex are sometimes very subtle; indeed, in biblatex, proper treatment would be something like [date|year[month[day]]]).
S fre 13 nov 2015 07:41 Oliver Kopp <[email protected]> skrev: > Hi, > > 2015-11-12 23:50 GMT+01:00 Dominik Waßenhoven < > [email protected]>: > > > Did you enable the biblatex mode (Options > Preferences > Advanced > > BibLaTeX mode)? In biblatex, the year is indeed regarded as deprecated and > should be replaced by date. > > I recheked the biblatex manual available via > https://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex > > Thre on page 7 at the "book" type, it states that one can either use > year or date. Therefore, I vote for keeping "year" as required field > and put "date" as optional field. Thus, regarding year NOT as > deprecated. I, personally, even using biblatex, I always use the > bibtex mode as the UI in the biblatex mode is too cluttered in the > moment for me. > > Cheers, > > Oliver > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Jabref-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Jabref-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users
