hi daniel, ... i think for the sake of avoiding redundancy and saving everybody's time, i will not comment on the rest of your post, however i feel like i have to give credit where credit is due.
> I don't mean last modification time for all nodes, > just a mixin type... now, that idea i like. i think this could be implemented nicely into jackrabbit. actually, i think roys mention of the "etag" offers an even more interesting perspective, but the rep:lastModified-mixin sounds like a valuable extension to jackrabbit. > BTW, JSR 170-0.16.3 question: Why is the jcr:lastModified of nt:resource > is ignored from versioning? i agree again, i also think it should be COPY ;) thanks. regards, david
