Your assumptions are not right. As far as I know many people still uses Jersey 1.x (and JAX-RS 1.x), because of many issues the Jersey 2.x has (e.g. own DI framework, which is hardly compatible with Guice). That is the reason, why many developers stick with version 1.x.
I think It would be nice to have an option to use JAX-RS 1.x or 2.x, depend on environment application has. We want new features of Jackson, but Jersey 2 is frustrating and we cannot upgrade to JAX-RS 2.x четверг, 12 мая 2016 г., 22:38:50 UTC+3 пользователь Tatu Saloranta написал: > > Quick question: currently Jackson JAX-RS only requires JAX-RS (API) 1.1 > version. But there are some 2.x types that would be nice to support, so > would it be ok to increase minimum baseline to 2.0? > I remember that many Jersey versions uses 1.1 JAX-RS, but don't know if > such versions might still be in active use; I assume they aren't. > Please let me know if JAX-RS 1.1 is still widely used. > > -+ Tatu +- > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
