Quick question on how others feel about this PR: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-datatype-joda/pull/115
which adds support for deserializing Joda date/time values that were serialized without Joda module, as JSON Objects. As I added in a comment, my first reaction is that I am not sure such case should be explicitly supported, as it is sort of fail case and adds code to maintain. However, I am not regular user and my instinct does not always serve as good guidance on what users would find useful and valuable. So... WDYT? -+ Tatu +- ps. I also filed https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/2776 which is orthogonal to this question -- making it easier to avoid "mis-serialization", and guide users to add support module. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CAL4a10ika%3DjZYPFUWk_1OA7JGcjE-uiqYkUTmGpVeXZoMwRdDw%40mail.gmail.com.
