Hi!
Unfortunately none of the approaches worked... XmlBeanSerializerModifier
has a bug, and does not use the provided modifier, even if I override the
method you mentioned.
Could you help me where to report the bug?
Also where can I find some resources on the architecture of the Jackson
project?
BR, Zsolt
2017. március 23., csütörtök 6:45:18 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu Saloranta a
következőt írta:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Zsolt Balanyi <zsolt....@gmail.com
> <javascript:>> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Of course my code is related to XML:
>
> Right, I just meant it regarding general data-binding functionality.
> Your code can certainly use its knowledge as necessary.
>
> >
> > ObjectMapper om = new XmlMapper();
> > om.enable(SerializationFeature.INDENT_OUTPUT);
> > om.registerModule(new JacksonXmlModule() {
> > @Override
> > public void setupModule(SetupContext context) {
> > super.setupModule(context);
> > context.addBeanSerializerModifier(new
> > UIElementSerializerModifier());
> > }
> > });
> >
> > public class UIElementSerializerModifier extends
> XmlBeanSerializerModifier {
> > @Override
> > public JsonSerializer<?> modifySerializer(SerializationConfig
> config,
> > BeanDescription beanDesc, JsonSerializer<?> serializer) {
> > if (UIElement.class.isAssignableFrom(beanDesc.getBeanClass())) {
> > System.out.println(serializer.getClass().getName());
> > return new BSerializer((BeanSerializerBase) serializer);
> > }
> > return serializer;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > public class BSerializer extends XmlBeanSerializer {
> >
> > public BSerializer(BeanSerializerBase src) {
> > super(src);
> > }
> >
> > @Override
> > public void serialize(Object bean, JsonGenerator jgen,
> > SerializerProvider provider) throws IOException {
> > // The breakpoint on next line is never hit!!!
> > super.serialize(bean, jgen, provider);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > I create an object that extends UIElement, the appropriate BSerializer
> is
> > created, but never called.
> > Is this a bug in jackson-dataformat-xml, or I'm doing wrong something?
>
> One possibility is that if the type uses polymorphic handling, method
> called is actually
>
> public void serializeWithType(T value, JsonGenerator g,
> SerializerProvider p,
> TypeSerializer ts);
>
> and you may need to override that as well.
>
> -+ Tatu +-
>
> >
> > BR, Zsolt
> >
> > 2017. március 22., szerda 23:21:03 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu Saloranta a
> > következőt írta:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Zsolt Balanyi <zsolt....@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > The tag name can be easily renamed, by
> >> >
> >> > if (gen instanceof ToXmlGenerator) {
> >> > ((ToXmlGenerator)gen).setNextName(new
> >> > QName(bean.getClass().getSimpleName()));
> >> > }
> >> > doNormalSerialization();
> >>
> >> Yes, but that does not mean much when it's `jackson-databind` and its
> >> type handling code which can not call such method
> >> (it is XML specific and not needed for other formats).
> >>
> >> > The only problem is, that I need to serialize all other fields, which
> I
> >> > dont
> >> > know how... That is why I would need to get the method to perform the
> >> > serialization, as the default serializer would.
> >> > Also, the BeanSerializerModifier approach did not work.
> >> > The new serializer is only created, but not called during the
> >> > serialization.
> >> > Maybe it has to something with the fact that I register it for an
> >> > abstract
> >> > class, and the concrete implementors still use their defaults?
> >>
> >> BeanSerializerModifier is a callback, but yes, result would be bound
> >> for whatever type it was called for.
> >>
> >> -+ Tatu +-
> >>
> >> >
> >> > BR Zsolt
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2017. március 22., szerda 5:38:56 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu Saloranta a
> >> > következőt írta:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Zsolt Balanyi <zsolt....@gmail.com>
>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That was one of my first attempts :)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > <Page>
> >> >> > <uiElement>
> >> >> > <StackLayout>
> >> >> > <uiElements>
> >> >> > <Label text="some text"/>
> >> >> > </uiElements>
> >> >> > <uiElements>
> >> >> > <Image url="mypageUrl"/>
> >> >> > </uiElements>
> >> >> > </StackLayout>
> >> >> > </uiElement>
> >> >> > </Page>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The question is how could I ommit the uiElement nodes?
> >> >>
> >> >> <uiElement> itself matches property `uiElement` so that can not be
> >> >> removed.
> >> >> Or, if expectation was that property name would be replaced by type
> id
> >> >> that is not something Jackson supports or will be able to support --
> >> >> it may make sense from XML viewpoint, but would not work with JSON
> or
> >> >> any other supported dataformat. XML is bit of an outlier as its
> >> >> structural model is the most difficult one to support, of formats
> >> >> supported.
> >> >>
> >> >> -+ Tatu +-
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > BR, Zsolt
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2017. március 20., hétfő 20:16:38 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu Saloranta
> a
> >> >> > következőt írta:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Have you tried choice of `JsonTypeInfo.As.WRAPPER_OBJECT`?
> >> >> >> That does add type id as property-name "wrapper" in JSON, and
> should
> >> >> >> work quite similarly with XML.
> >> >> >> The main problem with XML is often, however, that the root value
> >> >> >> requires additional extra XML element.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -+ Tatu +-
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Zsolt Balanyi
> >> >> >> <zsolt....@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hi!
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > public class Page {
> >> >> >> > public UIElement uiElement;
> >> >> >> > }
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > @JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME, include =
> >> >> >> > JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY, property = "type")
> >> >> >> > public abstract class UIElement {
> >> >> >> > }
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > public class StackLayout extends UIElement {
> >> >> >> > public List<UIElement> uiElements = new ArrayList<>();
> >> >> >> > }
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > public class Label extends UIElement {
> >> >> >> > @JacksonXmlProperty(isAttribute=true)
> >> >> >> > public String text;
> >> >> >> > }
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > So basically I have a Page, that contains a StackLayout that
> >> >> >> > contains
> >> >> >> > a
> >> >> >> > Label and an Image.
> >> >> >> > It would solve the problem, if the JsonTypeInfo could put the
> type
> >> >> >> > name
> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> > the element name...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > BR, Zsolt
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > 2017. március 20., hétfő 19:22:10 UTC+1 időpontban Tatu
> Saloranta
> >> >> >> > a
> >> >> >> > következőt írta:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> What is the POJO you are serializing?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> -+ Tatu +-
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Zsolt Balanyi
> >> >> >> >> <zsolt....@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > Hi!
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > I have a structure that outputs this:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > <Page>
> >> >> >> >> > <uiElement type="StackLayout">
> >> >> >> >> > <uiElements type="Label" text="some text"/>
> >> >> >> >> > <uiElements type="Image" url="mypageUrl"/>
> >> >> >> >> > </uiElement>
> >> >> >> >> > </Page>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > I use @JsonTypeInfo(use=JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME,
> >> >> >> >> > include=As.PROPERTY,
> >> >> >> >> > property="type") on the common base class.
> >> >> >> >> > How could I get the following output:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > <Page>
> >> >> >> >> > <StackLayout>
> >> >> >> >> > <Label text="some text"/>
> >> >> >> >> > <Image url="mypageUrl"/>
> >> >> >> >> > </StackLayout>
> >> >> >> >> > </Page>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > It does not matter, if it can not be deserialized by
> Jackson,
> >> >> >> >> > it
> >> >> >> >> > is
> >> >> >> >> > read
> >> >> >> >> > by
> >> >> >> >> > another system, that requires this structure.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > BR, Zsolt
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >> >> >> >> > Google
> >> >> >> >> > Groups
> >> >> >> >> > "jackson-user" group.
> >> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
> from
> >> >> >> >> > it,
> >> >> >> >> > send
> >> >> >> >> > an
> >> >> >> >> > email to jackson-user...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to
> >> >> >> >> > jackso...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google
> >> >> >> > Groups
> >> >> >> > "jackson-user" group.
> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it,
> >> >> >> > send
> >> >> >> > an
> >> >> >> > email to jackson-user...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to jackso...@googlegroups.com.
>
> >> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> >> > Groups
> >> >> > "jackson-user" group.
> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> >> >> > send
> >> >> > an
> >> >> > email to jackson-user...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to jackso...@googlegroups.com.
> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups
> >> > "jackson-user" group.
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send
> >> > an
> >> > email to jackson-user...@googlegroups.com.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to jackso...@googlegroups.com.
> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > "jackson-user" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> > email to jackson-user...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> > To post to this group, send email to jackso...@googlegroups.com
> <javascript:>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jackson-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jackson-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to jackson-user@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
