Update on 01-Oct-2019 PST: Sonatype admins were able to resolve the issue (https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-51881) so now `2.10.0` of `jackson-annotations` should have matching hash signatures too.
So as far as I can tell, Jackson 2.10.0 is now successfully released. Enjoy! -+ Tatu +- On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 6:27 PM Tatu Saloranta <t...@fasterxml.com> wrote: > > Two quick notes. First: I spent some time to write a summary of 2.10 > changes; results being here: > > https://medium.com/@cowtowncoder/jackson-2-10-features-cd880674d8a2 > > I hope you will find that useful. I hope to find time & energy to > write follow ups about PolymorphicTypeValidator usage; JsonNode (tree > model) improvements and Jackson-jr custom value readers/writers. > Also open to suggestions for better Blogging platform to use. > > Second: although Sonatype helped get `jackson-annotations` package > completely in their Nexus repo, it appears that somehow it ended up > with mismatching checksums. This is... not good. I will try to get > this resolved, but at this point I am quite frustrated having spent > days trying to resolve this and no doubt ending up spending much more > to answer questions from frustrated users. > > One thing you can do to help is to (a) NOT send reports to jackson > mailing lists (or me personally) but if you want, (b) follow up on > https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-51881 (or file separate Jira > issue). > > I will probably have to release 2.10.1 sooner than anticipated due to > this, as well as due to Maven tooling's handling of `pr` qualifier. I > do not look forward to spending another full work day's worth of time > but that's what it will be. > I hope you keep amount of effort in mind when requesting releases: a > full minor/patch release is 4-8 hours of uncompensated and somewhat > thankless work (and lately 8+ hours). > This is not a complaint about developer or user base: you are > wonderful. But the mechanical work to support Jackson itself is not > super rewarding, even when it is useful for larger community. > I will investigate if there is something that could help with it. > > -+ Tatu +- > > ps. After working on documentation, I will at some point write more > about Tidelift subscriptions as one mechanism to help support future > Jackson development work. Until then feel free to have a look at what > is behind those "Sponsor" and "Tidelift" badges, if interested. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jackson-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-user/CAL4a10jat4SCtciOMnkkyWxnHP0ZBhwVRLPqxVjoaM4LU-VGbA%40mail.gmail.com.
