If we come up with anything, I'll let you know. On Apr 2, 2014 5:01 PM, "Marc R. Hoffmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > to be honest: If I could answer your questions filtering would have > already been implemented ;-) > > JaCoCo does not process any source code, it only works on class files. I > would prefer to stick with this paradim also for filters. > > Best regards, > -marc > > On 02.04.14 17:10, [email protected] wrote: > >> We would happily implement our own filtering, is there a particular class >> we should be overriding or modifying? >> The reporting examples perform three steps: >> - loading the execution data >> - analysis >> - report generation >> >> If there are particular source code patterns that we want to ignore, what >> class(es) should be modified to implement the ability to ignore that code. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/jacoco/9RNKpkcDO4E/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
