On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 3:25:00 AM UTC+1, 
[email protected] wrote:
>
> Thank you so much! I have one more question please suggest if I should 
> post this in another thread. 
>
 
Yes, it is better to have separate threads for completely separate 
questions.
 

> I have used JaCoCo report (jacoco.exec) in SonarQube and Eclipse through 
> EclEmma and noticed that Eclipse shows roughly half coverage of what 
> SonarQube displays. Is there any setting required in Eclipse? As eclipse 
> has .java and .class files both so can that make this difference.


Bear in mind that
Generation of report requires exact same class files that were used to 
construct exec file - see 
http://www.jacoco.org/jacoco/trunk/doc/classids.html
Eclipse uses own compiler (ECJ) to create class files and they are 
different from classes produced by javac.

EclEmma allows to execute tests with coverage, so actually you don't need 
to import existing exec file.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/a5f4837b-2ce0-4739-8356-f4ab45075391%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to