Hi Marc
> I just discussed your request Evgeny and we came up with the following > remarks/questions: > Thank you for putting your time into this. > 1) There can be various configuration mistakes which can lead to empty > coverage reports for some modules. If we “magically” hide them from the > report this will hide such configuration errors and might confuse user. > I understand this clearly, and I don't want them to disappear magically. > 2) If you explicitly list the modules, what exactly is the problem to have > them visible in the report (even if empty)? > More than anything else, it was a curiosity. I was wondering, as I said before, if there was the possibility to hide it, I really don't need it, as you said it could help find configuration errors. I was just discussing all the N/A results with a colleague and if it was better to have them all for a clearer and more comprehensive report instead of removing them from the report. I understand you now, of course, and it is much better to have everything visible for a complete overview of the coverage, I will simply remove the modules from the list if we don't really need them in the report. Thanks again, Carmine > Regards, > -marc > > > -- Carmine Vincenzo Russo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/CAA6KdKdu2JozHghYOtUGeO6M-TVwdT2kT3%2BpifQ7BYBD8-PdTg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
