On 12/22/2016 11:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2016-12-22 14:43, Ralf Ramsauer wrote: >> `uname -m` might return 'armv7l', which is not the correct ARCH in this >> case. The correct ARCH is arm. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ralf Ramsauer <[email protected]> >> --- >> scripts/include.mk | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/include.mk b/scripts/include.mk >> index 740e7b03..578d5683 100644 >> --- a/scripts/include.mk >> +++ b/scripts/include.mk >> @@ -52,3 +52,6 @@ ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m) >> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64) >> override ARCH = x86 >> endif >> +ifneq (,$(findstring arm,$(ARCH))) >> +override ARCH = arm >> +endif >> > > Do we have such problems with arm64/aarch64 as well? On `uname -m`, my TK1 reports 'armv7l', TX1 reports 'aarch64'. So I guess other ARMv8 SoCs should report 'aarch64' as well, and arm32 contain at least 'arm'.
Ralf > > Jan > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jailhouse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
