On 2018-03-04 18:32, Adeel Ahmad wrote: > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 9:01:24 PM UTC+5, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi Adeel, >> >> please don't top-post on mainling lists. > > Sorry, I'll use inline reply from now onwards. Although, I'm still not able > to highlight the original text in gray. > >> When already building from sources, why not a recent stable version? > > The requirements in jailhouse-images README read QEMU 2.7 (so, I thought it > only worked with that particular version). Maybe it should be changed to QEMU > >= 2.7 to avoid the confusion.
It is currently "QEMU version 2.7 or newer". > >> But you revealed a mistake in the Jailhouse README: x-buggy-eim was only >> introduced to in QEMU 2.8. Could you send a fix for that? > > Yes, I'll email the patch to the mailing list. Should I just remove > x-buggy-eim, or would it be better if I first checked QEMU version, and if > it's > 2.7, the x-buggy-eim property will be used? Let's make it simple and just go for >= 2.8. Jan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jailhouse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
