On 25.09.20 09:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 22.09.20 08:45, Alice Guo wrote:
+        .platform_info = {
+            /*
+             * .pci_mmconfig_base is fixed; if you change it,
+             * update the value in mach.h
+             * (PCI_CFG_BASE) and regenerate the inmate library
+             */
+            .pci_mmconfig_base = 0xfd700000,
+            .pci_mmconfig_end_bus = 0x0,
+            .pci_is_virtual = 1,
+            .pci_domain = 0,
+
+            .iommu_units = {
+                {
+                    .type = JAILHOUSE_IOMMU_ARM_MMU500,
+                    .base = 0x51400000,
+                    .size = 0x40000,
+                    .arm_mmu500.sid_mask = 0x7f80,

How is the sid_mask of a platform retrieved? Can this be derived from information in a normal device tree?

Or is this coming from here:

/* ID0 */
id = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_ID0);
[...]
/* Max. number of entries we have for stream matching/indexing */
if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2 && id & ARM_SMMU_ID0_EXIDS) {
         smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_EXIDS;
         size = 1 << 16;
} else {
         size = 1 << FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_ID0_NUMSIDB, id);
}
smmu->streamid_mask = size - 1;

If it were so simple, I would actually say do the same in Jailhouse and drop the configurable. We may even demand ARM_SMMU_ID0_EXIDS if that is practically the only case in the field by now.

This was non-sense.


But I'm lacking a full picture yet.


Seems to be the DT property stream-match-mask. And that's unset for the zynqmp, so let's see how far I'll get with that.

Jan

--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jailhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jailhouse-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jailhouse-dev/e566d2fb-c942-ec6a-829f-0ac22b3c5ca1%40siemens.com.

Reply via email to