----- Original Message -----
From: "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: sexy names
> Excellent point. I'm perfectly fine with Cactus as a
> pre-release codename. We can address the release at a
> later date.
>
I'd rather keep Cactus if possible. Changing a name is always difficult.
> --- Alex Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No problem at all. You can name the product
> > 'JEUnit', and keep the codename
> > 'Cactus' -- for example for the first release. Not
> > unlike 'Tomcat 4' and
> > 'Catalina'.
> >
> > Un saludo,
> >
> > Alex.
> >
> > "Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
> >
> > > Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I know most of us are happy with it, but I just
> > want
> > > > to point out that Cactus is not a boring,
> > descriptive
> > > > package name (like JEUnit, for example).
> > According to
> > > > our charter, we do try to keep it simple. :(
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am going to stifle the urge to riff on the idea
> > of what's sexy for you
> > > about 'Cactus'.
> > >
> > > ;->
> > >
> > > I liked JEUnit better as well - it is a good
> > direct parallel to JUnit,
> > > and people know what that is.
> > >
> > > geir
> > >
> > > --
> > > Geir Magnusson Jr.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Developing for the web? See
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
> >
>
>
> =====
> Morgan Delagrange
> Britannica.com
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
