"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, James Strachan wrote:
>
> > I've a variety of collection utility classes that I've used on a various
> > projects that I'd like to contribute to the collections project.
>
> [SNIP]
>
> I like the set you are proposing, but have one comment/question.
>
> It seems to me that SynchronizedQueue might fit better into a package of
> classes specifically focused on communicating between threads in a
> multi-thread application. One such set of classes is my
> "threading" proposal in the sandbox. Another possible source was
> suggested on the list today (the "util.concurrent" thread).
>
> What would you think about focusing the "collections" package on things
> that are independent of multi-thread communication assumptions, and having
> a separate Commons package ("threading" or "multithread" or whatever) that
> is specifically focused on that need?
Why not start bringing them together into the current 'threading'
package currently in the sandbox? Would that be acceptable to all
parties?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
