Peter wrote:

>Looks good but I would use terminology Micro instead of Point as that is 
>the terminology used in JDK Package/Extension versioning.
>
>I would also specify that "in development" == alpha and you could have 
>releases such as 1.0a1

Both suggestions sound reasonable to me.

I'm actually a bit uncomfortable with the terminology in general (things 
like "external-interface-compatible" seem a bit too verbose to me) but I 
can't think of anything better either.


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Reply via email to