> > It is usefull for two reasons: 1. the way we do include, we need an unique > name. >
I'm talking about samples here. Samples aren't meant to be included > 2. when released, the directory tree will be removed and you still want to > recognise it as a test file. > > My idea is library files will be flatten (because included), but samples/tests will remain in a directory structure, so it's easy to find them. Do we agree ? Cheers, Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
