2008/10/6, Rob Hamerling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > BTW could serial_hw_int_cts.jal lib be based on existing > > serial_hardware.jal one, or would it be overkill (stack problem, no > > overlap or not enough relevant overlap) ? > > I didn't look in serial-hardware.jal until a few moments ago. On first > sight I don't think it is very useful, but it has some facilities that > could be useful. Maybe good for future enhancement. > Don't do this. Just keep the interface the same (or similar if nescesarry).
Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
