Hi Seb,
Sebastien Lelong wrote: > After a long meeting this morning with buildbot, I guess I have to give > jalv2 2.4l beta to him. Even if pseudo-var aliasing isn't working, it may be > a good idea to include it now. And at least buildbot will stop to claim for > it. All samples compile OK with compiler version 2.4l and the *current* device files (without the alias keyword). When 'alias' is used in the device files 16 samples fail because of the issue with an alias for a pseudo variable (in the baseline PICs). I'm ready to commit the new device files with 'alias' and some fixes (issues #82, reopened #57). I was waiting for a new pinmap file (issue #78), but I think it is better for our overall progress not to wait for a new pinmap file. What's your opinion guys? Regards. Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
