On Dec 14, 11:58 pm, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like jallib to have junk/null variables such as: > > jallib_null_bit > jallib_null_byte > jallib_null_word > jallib_null_dword >
Hi Matt, I don't understand -- are you suggesting a naming convention, or are you wanting some pre-defined global variables? It is my understanding that JAL compilers go to great lengths to recover the space, such that nothing is wasted. Have you done some experiments to prove that space is actually wasted? And ignoring a return value -- should be a fairly rare situation. William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
