SDCC have often a bad attitude. It sometimes crashing without a clue. Can't face any type of project and support for 16F's is poor. SDCC don't have reports about memory occupied and such as JAL is reporting after a successful compilation.
SDCC is too general (and mainly for 8051) and generate a big code. Can't stand up against JAL. Not even against PMP (Pic Micro Pascal), a free Turbo Pascal french compiler for 12F, 16F, 18F which generate assembler for MPLAB and have a FP Math for 18F's and some of 16F's. SDCC is forcing you to look for other solutions.... Vasi On Dec 17, 10:40 am, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > Sunish Issac wrote: > > New question there, what are the advantages of jalv2 over sdcc. > > For me crucial: I did not succeed in compiling SDCC for my favorite OS: > eComStation (OS/2). Otherwise I might not have switched to Jal at all! > > Regards, Rob. > > -- > Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
