On Jan 3, 3:17 pm, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > > You do not describe 'test' in item 2 (what should actually be done) > You do not describe who should do which tests. > How do you maintain this discipline (what happens or should happen when > somebody doesn't do what is supposed to do or even agreed to do)?
Here's a revised proposal, constructive comments and feedback are welcome: 1) tag a candidate release in Subversion 2) allow nnn days to give all team members the opportunity to do whatever testing they might wish to do. Participation is welcome but entirely voluntary. 3) After nnn days, if less than yyy non-critical bugs reported, then 4) release it. If 3) above fails, then we must start over at step 1. Thank you for your consideration, William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
