Joep Suijs wrote:
Or don't you agree delay_1ms(500) or delay_100ms(5) easier to read then _usec_delay(500000) ?
If readability is an issue, an alternative is: _usec_delay(500_000), or for 5 seconds: _usec_delay(5_000_000).
Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
