First of all, thank you Savageio, it is always good to see new ways of accomplishing the same task :)
Ok, sorry Joep. About the current servo lib: -It uses 2 interrupts per pulse (one to start the pulse and one to end the pulse). very efficient -It uses only one timer, where as this code requires 1 timer + 2 CCP. I don't quite understand the code since I haven't spent much time on it, but it actually looks like there will be 3 interrupts, one for timer1 and one for each ccp. I quickly compiled this code and put it on 18f452, but it gives too fast of a servo pulse. Matt. On Feb 27, 6:20 pm, Joep Suijs <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/2/27 mattschinkel <[email protected]>:> It seems that this code > will generate the same number of interrupts as > > my servo lib. One interrupt at the beginning of each servo, and one > > interrupt at the end of each servo pulse. > > > Joep, what is it that you see is more efficient? > > It is more efficient then the early libraries you worked on. I did > not look at them recently and that's why I did not say 'more > efficient'. > > Joep -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
