Kyle's documentation is strictly about the language, we have that already. Matt.
On Apr 1, 6:21 pm, Wayne <[email protected]> wrote: > mattschinkel wrote: > >> No, a Jallib reference needs to be separate. Also IMO the libraries, > >> even with current style rules need to be re-organised. I've had a bit > >> of a look at this in CatPad project. > > > I would not put much reference to jallib, but this book is being built > > by jallib. It is good advertizing for jallib. I would point people to > > the jallib style guide, they do not need to follow it. If the style > > guide is changed, then the book could be changed. > > > All code snippets should match styleguide, don't you think so? > > No, not really. > If I understand this correctly, the original PJAL covered jal 0.4 and > this new book is an update of the orginal, right? > > If this book is about JAlV2, the language. why should it have to be > restricted to the restrictions of the Style Guide? It's about the > language not the jallibs. > > JMHO > > Wayne -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
