Hi Rob, Two new samples are committed, all others removed. Please check if this meets your standards!
Joep 2010/10/24 Joep Suijs <[email protected]>: > Hi Rob, > > As you probably know, samples are generated from test files. For test > files, using rx and rx pins is a convienient: they automaticly map > software_serial to the pins already connected for serial hardware. > This is however quite confusing (see message at the jallist) in > samples. I'm in the process of adapting this (see latest commit). > >>> serial_sw_read(x) >> >> This gives a warning (and warnings are errors according to Eur!) > I agree with Eur and will fix this. > >> and also move the lines: >> >>> -- output the string, the pseudo var is the first param. >>> const byte str1[] = " - Test print.jal- bytes\r\n" -- define a string >>> print_string(serial_sw_data, str1) -- output string >> >> to before the forever loop, because once is enough I think! > I'll look into this. One of these messages is enough, but there might > me a need for an other message. > >> Of course I could have changed the sample(s) myself, but since you generated >> these ..... >> >> Regards, Rob. > As I said: I already started on the pin-definition part and will look > into the other suggestions too. > > Thanks, > Joep > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
