> >current dword 83832 cycles > >new dword 2203 cycles > > that's a big difference. on 20mhz, it is 4ms compared to > 0.1ms.
By the way, this is a good example on what I said about clock freqencies: changing the lib makes a 20MHz chip run like an 800MHz chip using the current lib ;-) But those are average values. On both variants large numbers take longer than small numbers. I think I'll investigate a bit more on this... Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
