> > I think additional "formatting" would be useful in > format.jal > I second that. This is the reason print.jal was created in > the first > place. The reason this is suggested means there is > something wrong > with format.jal ;)
I believe the flaw in format.jal is that it is not being discussed in detail recently ;-) I proposed the column-arrangement because I don't see a use for the print_array procedures without that. But if print.jal is only for unformatted output, I think both the fixed-point and the print_array do not belong there, but in format.jal. Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
