from SHT21 datasheet:

Sending a Command

After sending the Start condition, the subsequent I2C
header consists of the 7-bit I2C device address ‘1000’000’
and an SDA direction bit (Read R: ‘1’, Write W: ‘0’).

On Apr 4, 4:52 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]>
wrote:
> If you can access the device using i2c protocol, it inevitably has a i2c
> address as it's inner part of the procotol itself.
>
> Cheers,
> Seb
>
> 2011/4/4 Serdar K. <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> > The thing is, i can't find any data on the datasheet of SHT21 to address
> > them.
> > It has an ID, and you can read the ID, but no specific I2C address, and no
> > match mechanism is shown for the SHT21 ID as far as i could see.
>
> > 2011/4/4 mattschinkel <[email protected]>
>
> >> Why do you need 2 I2C ports? I2C is addressable and you may put more
> >> then one device on one I2C port.
>
> >> Matt.
>
> >> On Apr 4, 3:13 am, "Serdar K." <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/27 mattschinkel <[email protected]>
>
> >> > > > > MSSP2 will require a separate SPI library, or a constant in the
> >> > > > > current lib to choose between 1 and 2.
>
> >> > > > OK. I guess this is the same for serial hardware with RX1/TX2 and
> >> > > RX2/TX2.
> >> > > > Preprocessor to the rescue ?
>
> >> > > Someday we all need to decide on either using the same library twice,
> >> > > or create a 2nd library. A preprocessor doesn't seem like the right
> >> > > solution. Again, pointers would be nice.
>
> >> > I even do need it now.
> >> > Not only to decide which module, registers, i need to use seperate ports
> >> for
> >> > two different
> >> > devices simultaneously.
>
> >> > My need for now is to select different two similar (better equivalent)
> >> i2c
> >> > devices.
> >> > I use software I2C, my work is to be easier in this way, but it isn't.
> >> Or i
> >> > haven't enough knowledge about JAL.
>
> >> > ..........................
> >> > .....
>
> >> > var byte I2C_PortIndex = 1
>
> >> > .............................
>
> >> > ---
>
> >> //=========================================================================­­=====
> >> > --- //Initializes the ports for I2C interface
> >> > ---
>
> >> //=========================================================================­­=====
> >> > procedure i2c_initialize() is
> >> > ---
>
> >> //=========================================================================­­=====
>
> >> > if (I2C_PortIndex == 1) then
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_sda_direction = low;                // Set port as output
> >> for
> >> > configuration
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_scl_direction = low;                // Set port as output
> >> for
> >> > configuration
>
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_sda = low;           // Set SDA level as low for output mode
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_scl = low;           // Set SCL level as low for output mode
>
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_sda_direction = high;               // I2C-bus idle mode SDA
> >> > released (input)
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_scl_direction = high;               // I2C-bus idle mode SCL
> >> > released (input)
> >> > end if
>
> >> > if ( I2C_PortIndex == 2 )  then
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_sda_direction_2 = low;                // Set port as output
> >> for
> >> > configuration
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_scl_direction_2 = low;                // Set port as output
> >> for
> >> > configuration
>
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_sda_2 = low;           // Set SDA level as low for output
> >> mode
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_scl_2 = low;           // Set SCL level as low for output
> >> mode
>
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_sda_direction_2 = high;               // I2C-bus idle mode
> >> SDA
> >> > released (input)
> >> >   i2c_SHT21_scl_direction_2 = high;               // I2C-bus idle mode
> >> SCL
> >> > released (input)
> >> > end if
>
> >> > end procedure
>
> >> > .....
>
> >> > ....
>
> >> > This is only the shortest procedure.
>
> >> > This perspective is not tested OK yet, but i haven't be able to find
> >> another
> >> > way.
> >> > And all procedures are multiplied like this by the sensor count  (and
> >> also
> >> > the code size is multiplied).
>
> >> > If i could be able to dynamically change the alias to point another
> >> > register, this would never be a problem.
>
> >> > > Maybe you can ask William if you can add a optional constant for
> >> > > choosing what SPI port to use (after you test with ENC28J60 of
> >> > > course).
>
> >> > > Matt.
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups
> >> > > "jallib" group.
> >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > [email protected].
> >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>
> >> > --
> >> > *Serdar KIZILTOPRAK
> >> > Intelligence **Technology Systems
> >> > [email protected]http://www.its3k.com
> >> > +90(216) 518 15 00*
> >> >  **- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "jallib" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > *Serdar KIZILTOPRAK
> > Intelligence **Technology Systems
> > [email protected]
> >http://www.its3k.com
>
> > +90(216) 518 15 00
> > *
> >  **- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

Reply via email to