Hi Joep, I asked Kyle, we'll see what he's thinking about that !
Cheers, Seb 2011/5/3 Joep Suijs <[email protected]> > Hi Guys, > > > > We could also ask Kyle to add an internal compiler function used to > identify > > current used version while compiling in order to react differently. > > We've discussed this before, e.g. on april 17, 2009. There is a > constant that indicates the compiler version 2.4, but does not take > the sub-verions into account. So we have to consider how to start from > there. One could argue that if compiler versions are so different that > the library has to take them into account, it deserves at least a > minor version update (so we should ask Kyle to consider this). If it > also has to do with dealing with beta versions, add a constant with > the version/compile date could be considered - automatic (so not > forgotten) and able to deal with minor changes during the beta-period > that do not get a new ID. > > Joep > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
