On 1 May 2012, at 08:06 , Oliver Seitz wrote:
Hi again :-)
Eur, please do not feel you or your work as critisized.
I don't mind constructive criticism. This is open source. Anybody can
improve it.
As long as the code it not broken, feel free to modify or add to it.
It was just an example of existing code I have read recently. When
I wrote my lib, it took four days to write, and more than a week to
comply with the wishes of jallib team members. Then I was a bit
jealous, for your code is in there, and noone minds how global
variables are named. Now, my extended version has to declare
functions as internal, prefixes here, there, but not like that...
I just wanted to point out that it's probably not such a good idea
to have very high standards for new additions, while existing code
does not at all come near these standards.
Greets,
Kiste
(Kiste, of doos, als je niet het duits begrijpt :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jallib
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/
group/jallib?hl=en.
---
ir EE van Andel [email protected] http://www.fiwihex.nl
Fiwihex B.V. Wierdensestraat 74, NL7604BK Almelo, Netherlands
tel+31-546-491106 fax+31-546-491107
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
