Hi again,

Second problem is on receiver side.
It seems PIC is sending the right codes.
Thank you to all.

Cheers,
Filipe Santos.

On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 8:00:28 PM UTC+1 flyway38 wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Problem seems to be solved.
> It was due to using AN1 for the button (digital behaviour)...
>
> Right now am facing new problem.
> The follwing code seems not working ok;
>
> code
> serial_hw_write_word(0xEF2A + word(RlyCtl))
> /code
>
> RlyCtl is a pin (bit)
> When ON, sends to serial; EF2B (correct)
> When OFF, sends to serial; EF00 (Should send EF2A)
> Maybe some issue on receiver side, but I think that converting bit to word 
> seems problematic... not sure.
>
> Before was using "serial_hw_write" byte by byte but with longer delay in 
> between (longer than NOP, wich is used by word sender)
>
> Any ideas?
> Thank you very much.
>
> Cheers,
> FS
>
> On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 7:01:57 PM UTC+1 rob...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Filip,
>>
>> Are you saying that the code is executing slow?
>>
>> If you can share your program or at least the part that is problematic 
>> (so it can be reproduced) that could help.
>>
>> BTW (for Vasile 🙂). I recently worked on a problem of Hans using the 
>> DS18B20. It did work on one PIC but not on a smaller one. Finally the root 
>> cause was the PIC running at 4 MHz which was too slow to create the correct 
>> one-wire timing for the DS18B20. Switching to 8 MHz solved the problem. 
>> This was the first time that I encountered that a library did not work 
>> because of a clock speed begin to low. Maybe we should add a warning to 
>> that library.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *Van:* jal...@googlegroups.com <jal...@googlegroups.com> namens flyway38 
>> <fsfo...@gmail.com>
>> *Verzonden:* zaterdag 6 augustus 2022 18:39
>> *Aan:* jallib <jal...@googlegroups.com>
>> *Onderwerp:* Re: [jallib] IF/END IF usage limit?? 
>>  
>> Hi Vasile,
>>
>> Thank you for the quick reply.
>> Is have that feeling about something not right at some point of the code.
>> In fact tried to exchange some "if/end if" for "case of" but no luck.
>> Problem persists, but it seems only related to "if/end if" usage..
>>
>> My code reads the ADC (PIC18F2550), for 100 times in a "for/end loop".
>> Then find the median of values read and send that median value to RS232.
>> Also has a button to do some extra actions.
>> All this code worked great even in a smaller PIC (16F18313).
>>
>> Now have changed PIC for the 18F2550 and wanted to add some extra code to 
>> manage PWM and ADC reading times to find the median value.
>> Also added an oled display to show locally that value and the PWM/ ADC 
>> nr. of readings parameters. That's when this issue raised up.
>> Simptoms are the code running sluggish, not hangging...
>> Any ideas?
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Filipe Santos
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 5:13:36 PM UTC+1 vasile wrote:
>>
>> This issue appears usually when you do not manage in a correct way the 
>> timing required by a specific hardware and the costs of your code length is 
>> higher than required for the device to run properly. Common workaround is 
>> to use interrupts or other sequential techniques.
>>
>> Example: DS18B20 is a temperature sensor which requires 750ms or so for a 
>> 12bit conversion. If you have complex software involving USB interrupts, 
>> real time clock generation, 7segment LED multiplexed display, etc , and 
>> those are not shared correctly with your resources ( aka you try everything 
>> to be solved in pure software) at one moment your code will freeze at a 
>> specific code length. Removing some lines, no matter that are if/end if or 
>> something else will apparently make your code functional, but the issue is 
>> not where you suppose it is...
>>
>> Instead of if/end if you may use "case of". However it will not do 
>> something special or different compared with if/end if, except a more 
>> understandable structure for your source.
>> best wishes,
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 7:00 PM flyway38 <fsfo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is there any limit in using IF/ END IF conditions?
>> My code was running good untill added one more IF/END IF.
>> At first didn't realize about a limit in using these conditions code, but 
>> then figured out that any other IF/END IF removal would let my code run ok 
>> again...
>> Does anyone knows anything about this issue?
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Filipe Santos.
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "jallib" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jallib+un...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/3f8189dd-fd0a-4df9-8948-518503485e61n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/3f8189dd-fd0a-4df9-8948-518503485e61n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "jallib" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jallib+un...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/d77c7605-af0d-43ff-b2fb-4fe3a987e507n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/d77c7605-af0d-43ff-b2fb-4fe3a987e507n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jallib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/cd28680f-a2db-4c6b-a25e-b9423f1ced1en%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to