Hi David,

I did not see it as blaming, you just reported an issue with a library.

Good that you found it. I already uploaded the change to GitHub so it will be 
in the next release.

Kind regards,

Rob

________________________________
Van: jallib@googlegroups.com <jallib@googlegroups.com> namens David VB 
<pinhead...@gmail.com>
Verzonden: vrijdag 29 maart 2024 20:03
Aan: jallib <jallib@googlegroups.com>
Onderwerp: Re: [jallib] i2c_hardware.jal incompatible with pic16f1778 family ?

Hi Rob,

Thank you for your reactivity!
I will check your solution this week-end, but it seems to be OK.

(Btw: I hope you did not think I was blaming anyone.... my first message may 
sound harsh, but it was not my intent....  my apologies if you felt hurt....)

Enjoy your week-end,

Kind regards,

David
Le vendredi 29 mars 2024 à 07:22:10 UTC+1, Rob CJ a écrit :
Hi David,

Found a workaround for the library without breaking anything. Should work and 
will upload it this weekend.

Solution is as follows:

   if defined(i2c_scl_direction) then
      -- User defined i2c pins.
      i2c_scl_direction = input
      i2c_sda_direction = input
   else
      -- Default i2c pins from device file.
      pin_SCL_direction = input
      pin_SDA_direction = input
   end if

Kind regards,

Rob

________________________________
Van: jal...@googlegroups.com <jal...@googlegroups.com> namens Rob CJ 
<rob...@hotmail.com>
Verzonden: donderdag 28 maart 2024 18:51
Aan: jal...@googlegroups.com <jal...@googlegroups.com>
Onderwerp: Re: [jallib] i2c_hardware.jal incompatible with pic16f1778 family ?

Hi David,

I had never noticed it but you are right. I am not sure if PPS existed when 
that library was created.

There is another thing and that is that library violates with the style guide 
rules. The style guide states that the user should set the pin direction, not 
the library (I did not know this when I started with JAL so some of my first 
libraries are not compliant with the style guide too).

When the change that you mentioned would be implemented, sample files will 
break and the main program should define the aliases. But when taking the style 
guide into account then pin_SCL_direction and pin_SDA_direction should be 
removed completely from the library since the main program would set the 
correct pins to input and so your program would work since you define which 
pins should be set to input.

So I could make the change and update all sample files accordingly but it will 
result in compile errors for JAL users that use this updated library.

And since this library can be 'swapped' with the i2c_software libarary, that 
one also needs the change.

So I am interested in the opinion of the JAL users about this modification. To 
do or not to do, that is the question.

Thanks.

Kind regards,

Rob





________________________________
Van: jal...@googlegroups.com <jal...@googlegroups.com> namens David VB 
<pinhe...@gmail.com>
Verzonden: woensdag 27 maart 2024 22:57
Aan: jallib <jal...@googlegroups.com>
Onderwerp: [jallib] i2c_hardware.jal incompatible with pic16f1778 family ?

Hi,

Just found something....  (Jallib 1.8 - Official release, no bees)

In the header of i2c_hardware, it is mentionned that:
-- Define i2c pins like:
-- alias i2c_scl            is pin_c3              -- optional
-- alias i2c_scl_direction  is pin_c3_direction
-- alias i2c_sda            is pin_c4              -- optional
-- alias i2c_sda_direction  is pin_c4_direction

Later, in the code, procedure i2c_initialize, we use, instead:
   pin_SCL_direction = input
   pin_SDA_direction = input

The problem is that, in the device file we have, only for SCL the following 
definition
alias               pin_SCL_direction         is pin_C3_direction

In my application, I use the PPS to reassign SCL to RB6

So, I cannot re-assign pin_SCL_direction to pin_B6_direction.

No big deal: I copied a local version of the library in my project and changed 
the i2c_initialize procedure with:
     i2c_SCL_direction = input
     i2c_SDA_direction = input

I do not know if this has already be changed for 1.9, but I suggest something 
be made.....

(Just my 2 cents)

Kind regards,

David

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jallib+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/f465c30e-73ec-4ada-81f2-f8b41db093c4n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/f465c30e-73ec-4ada-81f2-f8b41db093c4n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jallib+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/GVXP195MB1637EEBB7BED481F975B2E91E63B2%40GVXP195MB1637.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/GVXP195MB1637EEBB7BED481F975B2E91E63B2%40GVXP195MB1637.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
jallib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:jallib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/ab25f644-a032-4d91-bfc8-50139695905dn%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/ab25f644-a032-4d91-bfc8-50139695905dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jallib+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/GVXP195MB16373EFF02B5130D2B47A301E63A2%40GVXP195MB1637.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

Reply via email to