For my money, changing the JDK requirement for James needs a vote.

At the same time, I'm happy to make 1.4  the requirement, if , say 
someone wants too use the Assertion Facility, NIO or java.util.regex.* etc.

Charles



Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>So the answer is Java 1.3
> 
> 
> Danny also said "avalon dependancies may limit this to 1.4 for 2.1x versions
> (head of cvs)" and "newer [than 2.0a3] releases will be compiled by 1.4."
> 
> So far I haven't had a problem running the CVS (2.1) release with JDK 1.3,
> but I don't know if newer releases of the Avalon components will require
> 1.4.  As I understand it, so far there is not a requirement for JDK 1.4 in
> either James or the Avalon components we depend upon.
> 
> However, as I understood your question, you want to know if/when it is OK to
> start making use of JDK 1.4 capabilities in James.  That question doesn't
> appear to be answered by TFM.
> 
>       --- Noel
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter M. Goldstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 5:47
> To: 'James Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Random Version Question Time
> 
> Danny et al,
> 
> Sorry about that.  Don't know how I missed it.  :)
> 
> So the answer is Java 1.3
> 
> --Peter
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 2:06 AM
>>To: James Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: RE: Random Version Question Time
>>
>>pgoldstein wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'd like this detail to be someplace very obvious.  Is there a
>>>consensus on this?
>>
>>RTFM
>>
>>Peter _read_ the james homepage http://jakarta.apache.org/james/index.html
>>and you'll see it states "James requires Java 2 (either JRE 1.3 or 1.4
>>as of 2.0a3)"
>>
>>James 2.0a3 will build and run under 1.3 or 1.4, I believe avalon
>>dependancies may limit this to 1.4 for 2.1x versions (head of cvs)
>>Serge hacked the db pool and build.xml to compile against the correct
>>version of JDBC for the JDK version being used.
>>
>>Up to 2.0a3 binary releases made by me were compiled by 1.3, newer
>>releases will be compiled by 1.4 on the principle that we should
>>be using the latest stable JDK for releases where possible.
>>
>>d.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to