----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I think that you just have a very hard time not pointing fingers. .. > to point fingers at. Ego-less programming. If a change breaks something, > the change is broken, NOT THE CHANGER. >
Noel if there are many regressions caused by one developer, it is the right thing to point fingure and expect improvements. I will be happy if the person promises to test more in future. If there are number of changes(as half a dozen protocol server regressions indicate) the process is to have a proposal not checkin into head. Checkin into head impacts everyone and causes 11th hour headaches for the release. Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
