Because I haven't fllowed this discussion fully:
+0

FWIW I agree with the sentiment expressed elsewhere that NNTP has had a
number of significant minor defects in it for some time, and that this
current regression defect has also not been spotted before now, ipso-fact it
is not a showstopper for the majority of serious users.
Therefore disabling it by default, publishing a warning and defering the bug
seem to be the safest route to resolve what has all the halmarks of a
conflict between two issues, and the risk of re-introducing the original
problem.

d.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 December 2002 16:07
> To: James-Dev Mailing List
> Subject: [Vote - v2.1.0 Release] Disable NNTP by default
>
>
> For v2.1, I propose that we disable NNTP by default, mark it as
> experimental, and agree that more of us will take a look at it in v2.1.1.
>
> I'll start with a +1.  And I believe (but could be wrong) that
> this vote is
> not subject to a veto, because it is a configuration default for
> a release,
> not a code change.
>
>       --- Noel
>
> P.S.  For v3, we'll have to decide what to do with NNTP and other
> protocols
> as we revisit repositories.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to