JDK 1.4 is not supported on Free BSD. I believe NIO works differently on Windows and Linux. jMule opensource project is secheduling time for this isses.
Another thing to watch for is the speed of application. It may sound strange but, I know at least one project that performed better after ported from JDK 1.4 to 1.3. It may be that 1.3 has smaller footprint. On the other hand James is likely to be a very IO intensive application and nio should help. Harmeet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Dec 31, 11:20 AM > > I'm not pushing 1.4.1 in any way. I'm just saying if we move to the > > JNDI DNS service, we get a perk if the user is running the new JDK. > > Ah, I understand. > > There are lots of benefits to JDK 1.4.1: > > - JNDI DNS Service > - JDBC v3 > - Better networking > - java.nio (too bad NBIO isn't more portable; we should look a SEDA, too) > - ... > > We ought to consider whether we are willing to maintain James v2 for JRE > 1.3+ and James v3 for JRE 1.4+. Considering that James v2 works well, and > James v3 will be a while in development, I have some inclination to suggest > that we adopt JRE 1.4+ for James v3. On the other hand, there is always > some risk involved in moving raising the JRE required. > > Thoughts? > > --- Noel > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
