I have used it too, and no probs. I can see no reason why these (javamail and dns) changes need be limited to only the 2.1 branch and not applied to the HEAD too. Can anyone? d.
> We already use JavaMail 1.3 with James. JM 1.2 had way too many > MIME bugs in > it. Yes hasn't it! > I've tested James (and our MLM code) with over 100K messages and found no > serious problems with it. The test messages were taken from mbox archives > off other mailing lists so have a variety of mail clients (and their > encodings). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
