Actually, I'm already using Jamailet 2.2.0a3 and have already re-deployed
Jamailet under it, but without using the new classloader functionality. The
fact is that the framework should stay in the phoenix/lib folder; at
present, I'm deploying the jar with the Matchers/Mailets to james.sar by
unzipping, adding jamailet jar, and re-zipping the whole into james.sar.

I hadn't a look to the new functionalities, but if I could simply copy my
jar under apps/james/SAR-INF/lib to make it work, then it will be better.

Cheerse,

Marco
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marco Tedone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "James-Dev Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: [ANN] New Jamailet version available


> > 1) The SenderHostIs matcher has been removed as now it's
> > part of the James standard distribution
>
> Just to be clear, the SenderHostIs matcher in James was submitted by Chris
> Means
>
(http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ache.org&msgId=480127).  I did not take your SenderHostIs matcher and move
> it into James.  That would have been, at best, impolite.  Also, according
to
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jamailet/ your code is under either GPL or
> LGPL, which is not compatible with the ASF License
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Licensing).
>
> Keep up the good work.  I just wanted to make sure that it clear that
James
> doesn't have code from your Jamailet package.
>
> When you get a chance, would you please take a look at v2.2.0a3, and try
> repackaging Jamailet using the new classloader functionality?  See:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?James/CustomMailetPackages.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to